Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Walmart : Duplicity of Management - Refined Ver.

Walmart : Duplicity of Management





(Always? How could it be plausible without any sacrifice?)

Walmart, the biggest private employer in America, employs an astounding 1.4 million citizens of the U.S.A., and its global sales have already crossed $400 billion in 2009. Walmart, specifically designed for customer’s convenience in shopping is still extending its realm across the world by aiming to provide customers with the best variety of products with good services and low prices. Now, consumption of Walmart customers represents the consumption of overall population in the U.S.A. the economy of Walmart is miniature version of total U.S.A’s economy. Yet, even more pitiful, the average wage of “Associates”( specific name for the workers of Walmart) earn only about $11.75(according to Business insider article written by Henry Blodget) an hour which produce annual earnings that, in a one-earner household, below the $22,000 poverty line. Thus, Walmart is subject to criticism by various groups and individuals for many different reasons. Although the CEO of Walmart or its managers try to argue that it’s not true, and that what Walmart really aims for is “to look for a better world”, there are facts and interviews that degrade Walmart’s good image and confuse people’s notions towards the company. Now, it’s time to scrutinize the truth about Walmart so that this could clear up all the controversies: mainly in an aspect of economy, and health insurance.




(CEOs of Walmart Sam Walton, Lee Scott, Mike Duke from the left to the right)

Before talking about the problems entwined with Walmart, knowing is necessary. As already mentioned, Walmart is the biggest private employer in the U.S.A and an average of 1.4 million people purchase 140,000 products in Walmart per year; that is, customer consumption sampling in Walmart will allow us to predict the consumption of citizens of America based on the sample. Although there are a lot of requisites that Walmart gratifies, the core stimulus of Walmart’s success are, according to CEO of Walmart, Mike Duke, the fact that Walmart concerns a lot about its consumer and their low price policy. Throughout an interview with Michael Moore, Mike Duke tries to show positive aspects of Walmart and we see Walmart’s psychological product displaying. For instance, by the end of the month, people only have few dollars to spend, therefore they prefer smaller quantity goods than wholesale goods; this is why, according to Mike Duke, Walmart provides both on the same shelf. In a similar way, Walmart allows convenient shopping and facilitates consumers’ consumption. Furthermore, Walmart is widely distinguished for its objectives to keep products at a low price as much as possible. This, of course, attracts consumers, and wielding an exclusive monopoly helps low income families, which are about 15% of the total American population. Overall, all these efforts of Walmart to attract its consumers eventually led them to $400 billion sales internationally.



(More Money? Hell Yes!)

Unfortunately, however, Walmart is causing problems globally because of its distinct features; although Sam Walton’s main concern was to keep its price low for customers, the company’s policy to achieve this are unjust: continuously curtailing its employee’s payment while keeping high salary for its CEO, and achieving its work by using over-time with its employees earning about $11.7 an hour. Regarding the fact that Walmart is a worldwide private giant with sales of $400 billion, if at least its $22 billion annual pre-tax income is compensated for its workers, Walmart most likely does not need to cut its employee’s income and can also keep its low price. Though compensating part of Walmart’s income to its employee is not plausible, an exclusively high salary for its CEO still doesn’t make sense. The previous CEO of Walmart, Lee Scott, had an annual salary of about $1.3 million and did not get any bonus. The current CEO of Walmart, Mike Duke, gets an base annual salary of $6.3 million and an executive income of $23.3 million. Yet, even considering Scott’s comparatively low annual income without any bonus, Scott contributed to Walmart’s expansion and was considered as a successful CEO. While the quality of a Walmart CEO neither decreased nor increased significantly, the salary has increased a great amount, and the salary for Walmart associates has been static or curtailed as time passed. There is no way that Walmart could explain this odd and paradoxical situation: even though Walmart’s main concern is to keep its low price, they increased their CEO’s salary while just cutting income for its associates. There’s no way that this situation could be explained except for saying that the way Walmart is working is clearly unjustifiable.



Furthermore, another significant issue regarding Walmart is the health insurance problem. As for October 2001, Walmart’s healthcare insurance covered about 44% of its employees. In comparison, Costco the wholesale rival of Walmart covered 96% of its eligible workers. Furthermore, to look at Walmart’s investment on its own employee’s health insurance, it’s about $3,500 for each employee, which is about 27% less than the average spending of retail industries’ budget set for their employees’ health insurance. Not only in the financial aspect, Walmart is also criticized for its quality of health insurance: employees often choose state insurance rather than Walmart’s insurance because of the quality, generosity, and price of health insurance. Even regarding this problem, the previous CEO of Walmart Lee Scott has acknowledged this fact that in some states, their state insurance benefits are more generous or better in quality compared to the insurance of Walmart. Although there has been various attempts to resolve the conflicts regarding health insurance of Walmart, most of the attempts from outside of the cooperation have failed and only a few more percentage of workers are able to take Walmart’s health insurance, which is still less than 50% of total Walmart associates. Yet, current CEO, Mike Duke, in his interview, condescendingly claimed about 95% of Walmart associates take Walmart healthcare insurance. Though we still don’t know, it is obvious that at least the CEO no longer interested in amending the health insurance system. The fact that there are controversies shows that at least there are conflicts or points where managers and employees should come to a compromise. Regarding this fact, current executives’ attitude towards Walmart health insurance problem is plainly absurd.


In a nutshell, it seems like Walmart needs to at least show its efforts to improve its
working environment and its problems: problems including financial irrationality and company healthcare insurance. Although we are not sure whether problems have been exaggerated or not, there are clear irrationalities within Walmart management, and Walmart needs to change its attitude in dealing with those controversies. As one of cooperates that represents the U.S.A., and Walmart has an obligation to address employees, even with the trivial problems.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Source:
“Walmart Employs 1% Of America. Should It Be Forced To Pay Its Employees More?”. http://articles.businessinsider.com. Business Insider. September, 20, 2010

“WalMart CEO Mike Duke is the voice of the common man”. http://youtube.com. You Tube. April, 22, 2009.

“Walmart CEO paid $23.3 million in fiscal 2007”. http://article.marketwatch.com. Market Watch. April, 20, 2007.

“Criticism of Walmart”. En.wikipedia.org. Wikipedia. Last modified on 26, February, 2012.

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Outline : Three person perspectives

To shortly introduce what is "Three sides story"(refers to "Three person perspective"), it is a story based on three person's perspective where each of them faces same situation.



In this post, I would like to elaborate my story's outline; since I'm currently in a cheer-leading team of Korea Minjok Leadership Academy, I would like to build up my story based on my own experience here. It haven't been a long time since I joined cheer-leading. Same for cheer-leading team, it was newly born club in our school. Hence, most of the members are females, me and one first grader "전인_"(for privacy :)) were the first male member in the team. Although I already has experience in hip-hop dancing in other school club, it's almost my first time doing another type of dancing called "Cheer-leading". Case for 전인_ was also not that different from that of mine; rather, his case was more desperate in a means that he never have danced before.



Currently, our cheer-leading team is preparing for our first stage with new members including me; considering above mentioned back ground, there were a lot of fun things and trouble happened during the practice. Me and 전인_ were especially the main characters of these troubles since we were the "only" two male cheerleader in the team and also unripe cheer-leading dancers.



Back to the main point: main theme of my story will be based on this short anecdote of mine from cheer-leading experience in a perspective of virtual me, 전인_, and one of the girls in cheer-leading team.

images from :

http://writingkmla.blogspot.com/

https://www.google.co.kr/search?q=cheerleading&hl=ko&newwindow=1&prmd=imvnsula&source=lnms&tbm=isch&ei=LqByT8CIFM6jiAe-5KzkDw&sa=X&oi=mode_link&ct=mode&cd=2&ved=0CCAQ_AUoAQ&biw=1304&bih=664

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Catfish- Yet have no idea

Catfish Official Trailer



2012, March, 20

Sadly, I still don't have no idea what I feel about the film "Catfish"(I'm using word "film" because it is still controversial rather Catfish is a documentary or a movie). I do know that I need to write something but this time, I don't want to write about Catfish yet when I have no deep impression about the film. Although Catfish was a nice directed film and introduction part was sweat enough for me to love the film, later when "real" Angela shows up, her bold-faced lie and brazen request to Nev was also enough for me to suddenly turn my attitude towards the film. If the film was a real documentary, I can't hide my impression that how one could be so impudent like that; if the film was a movie and all the situation was directed and virtual, still I can't consent to the intention of the director why he made such a character. Usually, it is normal for one to feel shame when one's lies are disclosed to other people; nevertheless, Angela's attitude was more like "I don't see the problem, I'm happy to see you, Nev!" rather than any kinds of feeling related to shame. Hence....... I don't think right now, it is unable to write proper film after-journal.

2012, March, 21

I figured out Catfish was actually a movie categorized; but, still don't know rather it is dealing with the real anecdote or fake.

Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Walmart : Duplicity of management

Walmart : Duplicity of management

Submitted to: Mr. Garrioch
By: Lee Ho Wook
Student ID: 111123
For: Junior Writing Composition
On: Thursday, March, 8th, 2012

Walmart, the biggest private employer in the America employs an astounding 1.4 million citizens of the U.S.A. and its global sales have already crossed $400 billion in 2009. Walmart, specifically designed for customer’s convenience in shopping is still extending its realm across the world aiming to provide customers the best compulsory products with good services and with low price. Now, Walmart represents the consumption of overall population in the U.S.A. and trend of consuming in Walmart indicates the economic and social situation of the U.S.A. Yet, more’s the pity, average of “Associates”, specific name for the workers of Walmart, earn only about $11.75 an hour which produce annual earnings that, in a one-earner household, below the $22,000 poverty line. Thus, Walmart is subject to criticism by various groups and individuals for many different reasons. Although the CEO of Walmart or its managers try to argue that it’s not true and what Walmart really aims for is “…… to look for better world ……”, there are facts and interviews that degrade Walmart’s all good images and confuse people’s notions regarding Walmart. Now, it’s time to scrutinize the truth about the Walmart so that this could clear up all the controversies among people regarding problems of Walmart: mainly in an aspect of economy, health insurance.
Before talking about the problems entwined with Walmart, knowing facts about the Walmart is necessary. As already mentioned, Walmart is biggest private employer in the U.S.A. Not only Walmart is the biggest employer in the America, Walmart is also one of the bookmarks of people around the world and in the U.S.A. Average of 1.4 million people purchase 140,000 products in Walmart per year; that is, trend of consuming in Walmart indicates the economic and social status of the people. Although there are a lot of requisites that Walmart gratifies, the core stimulus of Walmart’s success are, according to CEO of Walmart Mike Duke, Walmart concerns lots about its consumer and their low price policy. Throughout the interview of Michael Moore, Mike Duke tries to show positive aspects of Walmart and we see Walmart’s psychological product displaying. For instance, by the end of the month, people only have few dollars to spend, therefore prefer small pack than large pack; this is why, according to Mike Duke, right next to large pack, there is small pack of products. In the similar way, Walmart allowed convenient shopping of consumers and facilitates consumers’ consumption. Furthermore, Walmart is world widely distinguished for its objectives to keep products in low price as much as possible. This, of course, attracts consumers and wielding exclusive monopoly especially to the low income families which are about 15% of total American population. Overall, all these efforts of Walmart to attract its consumers eventually led them to $400 billion sales internationally.
Unfortunately, however, Walmart is globally giving a rising problems because of its distinct features; although Walmart’s or Sam Walton’s main concern was to keep its price low for customers, the company’s policy to keep is price low seemingly is going to an unjust way: continuously curtailing its employee’s payment while keeping high salary for its CEO and achieving its work done by using over-time working of its employees earning about $11.7 an hour. Regarding the fact that Walmart is a worldwide giant private mart sales of $400 billion, if, at least its $22 billion annual pre-tax income, is compensated for its workers, Walmart most likely do not need to cut its employee’s income and yet keep its low price. Though compensating part of Walmart’s income to its employee is not plausible, exclusively high salary for its CEO still doesn’t make sense. Previous CEO of Walmart Scott’s annual salary was about $1.3 million and did not get any bonus while current CEO of Walmart Mike Duke gets base annual salary of $6.3 million and executive income of $23.3 million. Yet, even regarding the fact that Scott’s comparatively low annual income without any bonus, Scott did contributed to Walmart’s expansion and considered as a successful CEO. While the quality of Walmart CEO neither decreased nor increased significantly, salary of Walmart CEO has increased for great amount while salary for Walmart associates has been static or curtailed as the time passed. There is no way that Walmart could explain this odd and paradoxical situation: even though Walmart’s main concern is to keep its low price, they increased their CEO’s salary while just cutting income for its associates. There’s no way that this situation could be explained except for saying that the way Walmart is working is clearly unjustifiable.
Furthermore, another significant issue regarding Walmart is health insurance problem. As for October 2001, Walmart’s healthcare insurance covered about 44% of its employees. In comparison, Costco the wholesale rival of Walmart covered 96% of its eligible workers. Furthermore, to look at Walmart’s investment on its own employee’s health insurance, it’s about $3,500 for each employee, which is about 27% less than average spending of retail industries’ budget set for their employees’ health insurance. Not only in financial aspect, Walmart is also criticized for its quality of health insurance: employees often choose state insurance rather than Walmart’s insurance because of the quality, generosity, and price of health insurance. Even regarding this problem, the previous CEO of Walmart Lee Scott has acknowledged this fact that in some states, their state insurance benefits are more generous or better in quality compared to insurance of Walmart. Although there has been various attempts to resolve the conflicts regarding health insurance of Walmart, most of the attempts from outside of cooperation has been failed and only few more percentage of workers were able to take Walmart’s health insurance which is still less than 50% of total Walmart associates. Yet, current CEO Mike Duke in his interview, seems like he is no more condescending to Walmart associates and media that he claimed about 95% of Walmart associates of the America is taking Walmart healthcare insurance. Though we still don’t know rather Walmart associates are fully having privilege of company’s health insurance, it is obvious that at least CEO of current Walmart is no longer interested in amending Walmart health insurance system. Fact that there are controversies in health care system of Walmart to its associates show that at least there are conflicts or points where managers and employees should come to compromise. Regarding this fact, current executives’ attitude towards Walmart health insurance problem is plainly absurd.
In nutshells, it seems like Walmart needs to at least show its efforts to improve its working environment and its problems: problems including financial irrationality and company healthcare insurance. Although we are not sure rather problems that Walmarts have been exaggerated or not, there are clear irrationalities within Walmart management and Walmart needs to change its attitude in dealing with controversies of its own. As one of the cooperates that represents the U.S.A. and as Walmart is responsible for its numbers of employees, Walmart has an obligation to be considerate about itself and employees even with the trivial problems.

Source:
“Walmart Employs 1% Of America. Should It Be Forced To Pay Its Employees More?”. http://articles.businessinsider.com. Business Insider. September, 20, 2010

“WalMart CEO Mike Duke is the voice of the common man”. http://youtube.com. You Tube. April, 22, 2009.

“Walmart CEO paid $23.3 million in fiscal 2007”. http://article.marketwatch.com. Market Watch. April, 20, 2007.

“Criticism of Walmart”. En.wikipedia.org. Wikipedia. Last modified on 26, February, 2012.

Sunday, March 4, 2012

Few Resources that may help Walmart analysis

Meanwhile, one of the world's largest corporations is still on a roll.

Walmart's global sales crossed $400 billion last year. Its profits exceeded $15 billion. Its market value--$200 billion--has weathered the Great Recession and market crash and remains near all-time highs.

Walmart employs an astounding 2.1 million people. In the United States alone, the company employs 1.4 million people. This is a staggering 1% of the U.S.'s 140 million working population.

Walmart, in other words, matters. Its payrolls, and its pay, move the needle.

And right now, many people argue, Walmart is very much part of the problem.

The average Walmart "associate," Wake Up Walmart reports, makes $11.75 an hour. That's $20,744 per year. Those wages are slightly below the national average for retail employees, which is $12.04 an hour. They also produce annual earnings that, in a one-earner household, are below the $22,000 poverty line.

On the other hand, these wages are far above minimum wage of $7.25 an hour. They also aren't THAT FAR below the national retail average (only 2.5% below). In a two-earner household, moreover, these wages would produce a household income of $40,000+, which, in some areas of the country, is comfortably middle-class. Walmart offers benefits to some of its employees, as well as store discounts and profit-sharing plans.

Walmart's model Walmart employee. Probably not making $11.75 an hour.Most importantly, in an economy that is desperate to find some way to employ the ~25 million Americans who are either unemployed or under-employed, Walmart provides 1.4 million jobs.

But Walmart is constantly under attack for reaming its associates, for paying them too little, for putting higher-paid workers at other companies out of work, for making a major contribution to the national problems described above.

And with $15 billion of annual profits, Walmart could certainly afford to pay its employees more.

So should Walmart pay its employees more? Should Congress pass a law FORCING Walmart to pay its employees more? If so, how much more? If Walmart did pay its employees more, what would happen? Would this begin to address some of the country's problems above?

Source


"Walmart Employs 1% Of America. Should It Be Forced To Pay Its Employees More?". http://articles.businessinsider.com. Business Insider. September, 20, 2010