Back Ground Music : Jascha Heifetz - Paganini Caprice No. 24
Perhaps,
the most precise and accurate description of realism would be magic realism.
Core idea of the realism is straightforward as it is: “a theory of writing in
which the ordinary, familiar or mundane aspects of life are represented in a
straightforward or matter-of-fact manner that is presumed to reflect life as it
actually is”. Unfortunately, this precise definition does not provide readers
what to read – what to focus and what to learn from the works. Furthermore, the
“aspects of real life” is even more opaque since the view of real world differs
from people to people. Depends on individual’s understanding of the world, meaning
of the literary works may differ greatly; however, ironically, this “vagueness”
is what makes work of realism so magical. It has a power to empathize with
thousand different people regardless of ethnicity and social background because
it does not force any specific message to readers, a true realism reflecting
real world. In this sense magic realism would be a true realism. Though magical
or unrealistic odd elements intervene a realistic portrait of the world, this
realistic depiction even makes the magical element so real. Thus, depends on
the reader, the work may become a fairy tale or could be a grave-most story
which contains truth about the human nature.
One
of the strangest and the remarkable aspect about the magic realism is that the
most unrealistic element so unaffectedly blends into the most realistic story. So
far, unless the genre is hybrid, while mostly characterized with realistic
depiction, works regarding magic realism literally contain magical element,
something that cannot happen in a real world. However, most distinguishing feature
of the magic realism is that this magical element is neither special to the author
nor to the characters – magic seems to be a “real thing”. One of the most
representative magic realism authors Gabriel Garcia Marquez’s story “A Very Old
Man with Enormous Wings” well shows this feature of the magic realism: when Pelayo
discovered the man with the wings, he visits “a neighbor woman who knew everything about life and death to
see him, and all she needed was one look to show them their mistake” to ask who
the man is. What she tells to Pelayo is that “He’s an angel.” Though readers
expect some change happen regarding Pelayo’s behavior, Pelayo only considers
the man as a mere strange creature to be “watched over…all afternoon from the
kitchen, armed with his bailiff’s club…” Even more absurd, Elisenda, the
wife of Pelayo, is only annoyed by the man even after Pelayo and Elisenda earns
much money from visitors of the man. This absurdity, or strange reality of the
story culminates in the conclusion where Elisenda kept watching the man “even
when she was through cutting the onions and she kept on watching until it was
no longer possible for her to see him…” The man is only an ordinary subject
that is “a bit” strange in the story. As such, magic realism makes the magic no
different from the reality.
If
the “real-like strangeness” were the feature of the magic realism, what makes
magic realism a true realism is in its “mirrorness”: the story reflects reader’s
life, a true real world in an individual’s view-point. In children’s view-point,
magic realism may be a simple fairy tale; in adult’s view-point, it can be a
story with life lesson that can be only achieved after years of experience. In
case of “A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings”, it could be a simplified “Harry Potter”
like version story, whereas, for adults, the story might be “inconvenient truth”
of cruel human nature towards strange, different, weak, dependent creature. Furthermore,
there are still a lot of rooms for different interpretation about motifs or symbols
used in the story. Another example, a movie “To Rome with Love”, one of the
magic realism works, it could be a story of time machine, it could be a story
about true love or a true image of love. If the audience is a staunch believer in
true love, movie becomes romance movie; if the audience is pessimist, movie
becomes criticism of love, that love is “Midsummer Night’s Dream”. Magic
realism gives no decisive message to the reader. Rather, its reflection of the
world is so real and aerial at the same time, when trying to look at the core
of the work, it only reflects reader’s mind just like a mirror.
In a nutshell,
magic realism could be interpreted as one of the attempts to depict a true real world. By only
constructing a background for readers to start imbue their own meaning to the
work, magic realism allows individuals to realize their personal “real world”
with each of their distinctive point of view.

I'm not sure if I'm allowed to comment on this because it says it is your first version, but I'll just jot a few things down because I read your journal and this it's fantastic.
ReplyDeleteJust a few things to mention:
While a lot of other people's journals mentioned about the quality/traits of the angel in different phrases, I never saw anyone that claimed the trait as "absurdity".
Frankly speaking, I don't quite get why it should be expressed so. The fact that an angel exists in the story itself might be accepted as absurd (or unrealistic). But what you've mentioned - Pelayo's behavior towards the angel not changing, or Elisenda not being happy with the angel's presence doesn't seem wrong at all. Rather than being absurd, I thought it was a very realistic portrayal of what humans are like - they do not thank what brings them luck, and actually even sometimes think of their "luck" as burdens - just what is happening in this story. The part you claim to be "absurd" is actually not absurd at all; maybe the action of neglecting the angel may be absurd, but it seems perfectly fine for the author to portray this in a realistic point of view. (I think I'm getting a little bit philosophical here, I hope you understand what I'm writing). Good work:)
Oh... thanks for such comment for my draft :)
ReplyDeleteWhat I've meant by absurd was that this absurdity, or so to speak "out of nowhere", the magical element, is well blended into the story as if it is real. Maybe I should have been little more clear in that part...
Thanks for bringing up new idea; your different interpretation also seems like part of my second point about the magic realism: the story mirrors the view point of individuals, therefore is realistic depiction of the world :)
First of all, great to see you focusing a bit more on the minor details of your sentences. Things quickly improve with a bit more meticulous revision. However, you still have this habit of starting a sentence with THE missing article. "Core idea of the realism is straightforward as it is.." Here we have a THE where it should not be (THE realism) and one missing where it should be (THE core idea). You very often start off sentences without THE. Keep that in mind.
ReplyDeleteAs well, while you have an intellectual tone, I have to question the actual content, and how far you progress your theory. Essentially, we are dog paddling through the basic definition of "magic realism" 60% of the way through, and by then it is getting too late to state something unique. I'm honestly not sure what Flora is seeing that I am not. When you get to university, you have to really "deliver the goods" quickly and concisely without roundabout diatribe decorated with pretty words. I feel this is a bit inflated. Some writers do this through summarization, while others may latch on to a concept and discuss it for 100-200 words too long (which, in my opinion, you are doing a bit of).
Anyways, in future journals I encourage you to get to a clear point more quickly, and then move on.