(The
Economist Feb 4th 2012)
Article Summary
China’s economy is so huge, and its significance to the world
so great, that it is easy to forget the country’s property market is still in
its adolescence. Two decades ago most city folk were consigned to dilapidated
quarters provided by their state-owned employer. In the years since then house
building has boomed and the cult of home ownership has taken a hold on the
Chinese psyche. But the market has seen epic swings, and prices are now falling
in many big cities.
In other parts of the world local governments raise revenues
by taxing homes based on something like their market value. In China taxing
property is a touchy subject. The government had tried imposing a variety of
levies on the sale, size and historical cost of property, but none on the
market value of homes. That changed a year ago, when Chongqing and Shanghai,
two giant cities, introduced a pilot tax on some upmarket homes. The tax was
largely symbolic, levied at low rates on a few thousand homes in each city. But
it nonetheless set a precedent. China should now broaden that tax to as many
properties as possible, in cities across the country.
For local governments a fully fledged property tax would
provide a stable source of revenue. Unlike workers or businesspeople, homes
cannot up sticks and leave. A property tax raises revenue year after year, in
contrast to a land lease, which can be sold only once. What’s more, such taxes
allow local authorities to capture some of the value they create: as they
invest in local amenities, property values rise, and so do the taxes they are
able to collect.
Economic terminologies
To tax (from the Latin taxo;
"I estimate") is to impose a financial charge or other levy upon a taxpayer (an
individual or legal
entity) by a state or the functional equivalent of a state such that failure to pay
is punishable by law. Taxes are also imposed by manyadministrative
divisions. Taxes consist of direct tax or indirect
tax, and may be paid inmoney or as its labour equivalent (often but not always unpaid
labour).
A property tax (or millage tax) is a levy on property that the owner is required to
pay. The tax is levied by the governing authority of the jurisdiction in which
the property is located; it may be paid to a national government, a federated state, acounty/region, or a municipality. Multiple jurisdictions may tax
the same property.
There are three
species or types of property: land, improvements to land (immovable man-made
objects, such as buildings), and personal property (movable man-made objects).
Real property (also called real estate or realty) means the combination of land
and improvements. Under a property tax system, the state requires and/or
performs an appraisal of the monetary value
of each property, and tax is assessed in proportion to that value. Forms of
property tax used vary between countries and jurisdictions.
(Reference
- Wikipedia.com)
Opinions
A
property tax could also temper the wild swings in China’s housing market. A
recurring levy would make it costlier to buy and hold a second or third home as
a speculative bet on rising prices. That would force some absentee homeowners
to sell their vacant flats or rent them to the many citizens priced out of the
market. Some economists believe that the light taxation of land in Japan
contributed to its ruinous asset-price bubble in the 1980s.
A
property tax would by no means be easy to implement in China. It would require
homes to be registered, title to be clear and the appraisal of property values
to be credible. But similar obstacles have been overcome in other developing
economies, including many cities in India.
Under
Chairman Mao, taxes on private property all but vanished along with private
property itself. Today’s Chinese set no store by the old socialist doctrine
that “property is theft”. But many urban Chinese now think of taxation that
way. They feel, with some justification, that they already pay too much to a
state that provides too little.
This
antipathy is not lost on China’s local governments. They are wary of angering
the urban middle class, who own their own homes, and the city elites (including
party officials and their families), who usually own several. So they continue
to cause anger by throwing rural folk off their land. China must now act boldly
to reform its taxation of property. Otherwise it will have to face the
consequences of continued weak local-government finances and even more social
unrest.
No comments:
Post a Comment